Defendant

B Imprisonment for four years, for four years and six months, for Defendant C, and for two years, for Defendant A, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, at the Seoul Mapo-gu P and 403 (Seoul Eastern Q building 503), actually operated the “R” of a personal business entity that imports and sells English teaching materials. From October 21, 201 to July 2012, 201, Defendant B, as the representative director of the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and T companies with the 1001 Sdong 10 Sdong 10 (hereinafter “T”), took overall charge of accounting and financial affairs, including the operation and execution of the company’s funds.

Defendant

C (U) from November 2010 to May 2012, 2012, Defendant B’s private business chain worked as the vice president of the said R; from March 2012 to August 2013, T’s representative director from September 2012 to November 2012; and thereafter, the private director was in charge of the business of operating T in substance as the sole director.

The victim Company V (hereinafter “V”) is a KOSDAQ-listed company mainly for the game software and service, etc., and is seeking the improvement of the company’s image and the profit-making business through the diversification of the business, such as training and the development of content linked to the publishing company, which is the victim company, the company’s representative director, WW-friendly and outside director of the above company, introduced Defendant A, etc. through introduction of Defendant C, etc., and conducted the business of distributing English teaching materials used by private teaching institutes equipped with school or educational facilities and producing new functional contents and procuring them in the educational market (hereinafter “instant business”).

Defendant

B is the parties to the above R, T representative and each business with the victim company, and the facts are the actual amount of money acquired by deceiving the victim company and the employees in charge of the practical affairs, as if they could perform the contract even though they did not have the intent or ability to properly perform the result of each business.