Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:00 on July 13, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) and around 03:45 on the same day from the salary distance from the bewing-ro of the South-west side of the South-west side of the North Korean Si, Chungcheongnam-si to the D Hospital emergency room located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., to the following day caused a traffic accident of pine trees by leaving a forest without a road from a T-type three distance to a forest without a road. Since there is reasonable ground to recognize that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, snoring, and inaccurateness, the Defendant was requested to take a drinking test from the racing and Police Station Emba, the background and method of respiratory or the method of collecting blood from G.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 아무런 이유 없이 음주측정기를 입에 물고 호흡을 하는 시늉만 하거나, 채혈을 거부하거나, 음주운전 경력이 있으니 봐달라고 말하는 등의 방법으로 위 시간 동안 4회에 걸친 위 경찰공무원들의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

2. The Defendant violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a H car.

On July 13, 2013, at around 02:00, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (the Defendant did not comply with the police officer's demand for a drinking test as in the preceding paragraph) and driven the front of the salary path, which is located in front of the salary path, at the right side of the salary tunnel, at the right side of the salary beach.

At night at the time, the driving vehicle of the defendant is formed in front of the coast area, and in such a case, the defendant engaged in driving of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to see the steering room and to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes accordingly.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and did not look at the front bank, and the defendant was negligent in proceeding as it is.