1. The plaintiff's claims that the court changed in exchange for the defendants are all dismissed.

2...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except that the court's explanation as to this case is that " Eul 1, Eul 5-1, Eul 5-5, Eul 9" as " Eul 1 through 11, Eul 4, Eul 5, 8, and 18 (including each serial number in the case of additional numbers)" is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants that had been changed in exchange for exchange in this court is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(B) The judgment of the court of first instance was invalidated since the previous lawsuit was withdrawn by the exchange change in this court.