logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2016.12.15 2014가단37655
용역비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. From March 29, 2014 to May 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) requested the Plaintiff, who runs a fibering business with the trade name “B”; (b) 33,338 Camps of chrops (on hand, 9,831 Camps were not processed and returned to the Defendant without processing); (c) the Plaintiff supplied 15,776 amps by August 1, 2014; (d) but the Plaintiff did not receive the amount of 4,771,80 won of chroding processing fees from the Defendant.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2 through 7 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 8 through 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the payment of 4,771,800 won for the Corating Processing Fee and the damages for delay.

Furthermore, the plaintiff asserted that the defendant is obligated to pay the above co-rating processing fees to the plaintiff, since he did not receive 6,836,280 won for the 5,179 king with the defendant's request. Thus, the plaintiff did not dispute the above 5,179 wing processing fees between the parties, while the plaintiff did not return 7,337 km from C, which is the customer, due to the defect that occurred during the plaintiff's co-rating process, according to the whole purport of the arguments in each of the above evidence, Eul and Eul evidence Nos. 15 and 17. As examined below, the defendant was returned 7,37 km from the customer, and the defendant requested re-rating to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff did not receive the above rating fees while the plaintiff re-manufacturing with the sing with the singing with the singish, the plaintiff's assertion that part of the above 5,179 Dod was not accepted.

3. Judgment on the defendant's assertion

A. As a result of the occurrence of a defect of ice in the original body that the plaintiff saw and supplied, the plaintiff shall compensate the defendant for the damage of KRW 68,060,761 caused by the defect.

arrow