beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,661,857 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from November 25, 2017 to February 21, 2019.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a company that engages in manufacturing, wholesale and retail business, and trade business, such as bags, bags, spas, knifes, and musical music, and the Defendant is a merchant that engages in wholesale and retail business of paintings in the name of “F” in subparagraphs C market D and E.
B. On November 2016, the Plaintiff requested Japan Co., Ltd. (G; hereinafter “G”) (hereinafter “G”) to supply 1950 bags in the form of a bags. The Plaintiff purchased 3 tariff from the Defendant “Erara” and manufactured a prototype as its main material.
As a result, the original body supplied by the Defendant at the time was proved to be an original body suitable for the production of the backciting.
C. Around January 2, 2017, the Plaintiff ordered the Defendant to pay KRW 305 U.S. 3,019,500 (including additional taxes) to the same original group of KRW 305 U.S., which is supplied by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant original group”) as its main location, and it is the main location of the original group supplied by the Defendant; however, the Plaintiff manufactured a backer requested by G by attaching the bamboo thereto and attaching it, and 1450 points around March 23, 2017;
5. 22. 500 each delivered each point.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant air bags”) 1950 bags supplied to G
D. G sold the instant back, but used as its principal source, caused a phenomenon of diversing salt of the original lap with the user’s clothes or laundry, which led to the Plaintiff’s laping phenomenon, which led to the Plaintiff’s laping of the instant back to the original lap with the Defendant’s clothes. As a result, the instant back was no longer used for its intended purpose.
G received a consumer’s claim, and accordingly, required the Plaintiff to make the entire call of this case.
E. On May 26, 2017, the Plaintiff delivered a sample of the re-reclaimed re-appellant from G to the Defendant. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant requested a test to the Defendant located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H to find out the status of one of the original parts of the re-appellant.
I, as a result of this test for quality control, shall be as follows: