1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation of ownership among the instant lawsuit is dismissed.

2. The defendant shall enter the plaintiffs in the annexed list.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 15, 1968, as the deceased in 1876 and died before 1960, the deceased Non-Party F (the Defendant’s husband) was living together with the deceased report when the deceased report was filed by the deceased Non-Party F (the Defendant’s husband).

B. G-si 103 G-si : The ownership transfer registration was completed on May 9, 1925, and it was divided into G-si 52 square meters and H-si 51 square meters (hereinafter “instant real estate”) on June 16, 197, and the above divided real estate became the ownership transfer registration date as follows: (1) The ownership transfer date of G-si 52 square meters on June 16, 197: the owner on June 15, 197: F (b) the ownership transfer date on April 22, 197: 1: the owner on June 18, 197: 1: 1: the ownership transfer date on April 3, 197: 1: G-si 52 square meters on June 16, 197.

C. The instant real estate was solely inherited to Australia due to the death of the network D before the 1960s, and due to the death of the network E and the death of the network P on July 26, 1986, Nonparty F (the husband of the Defendant), Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff B respectively were legally inherited.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2-1, 2-3-1, 2-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. On the lawfulness of the claim for confirmation of ownership ex officio, we examine whether the claim for confirmation of ownership (main claim) among the lawsuit of this case is lawful or not.

In the action for confirmation,