The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment with prison labor, one year of short term, ten months) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, and the facts that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case as a juvenile of 17 years of age, and that the defendant faithfully lives after returning to society, and that some victims do not want the punishment against the defendant are favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed in several times by the defendant entering a hospital where management was neglected jointly with his accomplices, stolen the cell phone 12 and credit cards, etc., stolen the stolen credit cards over four times, and stolen the food cost, etc., by threatening three victims, and thus, the crime is heavy, the victims are many, the victims did not reach an agreement with most victims, the damage was not recovered, and the damage was not recovered, even if the defendant was temporarily released on November 30, 2012 after receiving temporary release from the hospital, and the crime of this case was committed, and the defendant committed the crime of this case as long as it was long as the defendant received temporary release on November 30, 2012, and other various circumstances, including the motive for the crime of this case, the character and conduct of the defendant, the environment, family relations, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., were taken into account, and the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable, and the above defendant's assertion is therefore unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.