A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2012, the Defendant was issued a disposition to send juvenile protection cases to the Seoul East-gu District Public Prosecutor's Office as larceny; on May 30, 2012, a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases to the same public Prosecutor's Office as special larceny; on June 27, 2012, a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases to the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office as larceny; on July 31, 2012, a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases to the Seoul East-gu District Public Prosecutor's Office as special larceny; and on September 12, 2012, a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases to the Seoul East District Public Prosecutor's Office as special larceny, etc. was taken respectively.

On December 18, 2015, around 05:28, the Defendant, at a soup room of “E” located on the 10th floor of building Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD building 10, by taking advantage of the gaps of surveillance in the surrounding area, stolen property worth KRW 13 million in total from around the time to February 9, 2016, in total, 15 times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form (1).

2. On January 2016, 2016, the Defendant acquired stolens over three times in total, including the acquisition of stolens by purchasing KRW 100,000 from around the first time to February 5, 2016, one of the 6 mobile phone owners of the victim’s name, who was found in F, with knowledge that it is a stolen, from the victim’s name, while acquiring stolens. From around that time to February 5, 2016, the Defendant acquired stolens over three times in total, such as the list of crimes (2) in the attached method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F, G, or H;

1. Each statement of the thief victims;

1. Reports on each occurrence of a crime;

1. Previous convictions: Investigative inquiries about criminal history and investigation reports (attached documents, such as a written decision to forward the case to the Juvenile Department of the same kind of force);

1. Habituality of the judgment: The history of each thief crime, method and frequency of crimes, and the same kind of thief crime in the judgment are repeated several times in a short period.