logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.06.16 2015가합1440
건축물 사용승인 승낙청구
Text

1. The plaintiffs and the plaintiff succeeding intervenors are building owners as to the building listed in Attachment 1 List 1 Paragraph 1 to the Ulsan-gu Office.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 21, 201, S, along with T, completed the registration of ownership transfer for one-half portion of each of 1,046.9 square meters in Ulsan-gu U.S. (hereinafter “instant site”). On September 26, 2011, on the instant site, it was permitted to construct a new building on the instant site to the head of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, and on October 10, 201.

B. S has built and sold the buildings listed in Annex 1 List No. 1 (hereinafter “instant building”). G was sold in lots, the Plaintiff’s 201 and 901, the Plaintiff’s 202, H 302, the Plaintiff’s 401, the Plaintiff’s 502, the Plaintiff’s 301, the Plaintiff’s 601, the Plaintiff’s 702, the Plaintiff’s 801, the Plaintiff’s 802, the Defendant F 402, the Defendant P 602, and the Defendant Q 501, respectively, and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

C. As to subparagraph 201, G completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to subparagraph 201, and with respect to subparagraph 901, the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor M and the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor N, respectively, and H completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to subparagraph 302 to the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor L with respect to subparagraph 401 to the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor.

Through voluntary auction, with respect to the building owned by S, 902, the Defendant Daedong-Tech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dongdong-Tech”) acquired each ownership in relation to the building Nos. 301, 701, 1001, and 1009, Defendant R, and Defendant New Shopping Co., Ltd (hereinafter “new shopping”).

[Basis] The grounds for recognition: Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act; the remainder of the Defendants: the absence of dispute; the entries in subparagraphs A and 5 (including each number); and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against the Defendant Bridge, Defendant R

(a) an indication of the claim as specified in the corresponding part of the grounds for the claim in Appendix 2;

B. Articles 208(3)2 and 150 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable law

arrow