1. The defendant shall enter the "amount increased" column in the attached Form 2 compensation list to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the selected parties.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name: L development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public notice: M on August 13, 2012, M on the Gyeongbuk-do public notice on July 22, 2013, N on the Gyeongbuk-do public notice on November 18, 2013, and O on the Gyeongbuk-do public notice on November 18, 2013 - Project operator: the head of Sungju-Gun.

B. Adjudication on expropriation on March 12, 2014 (hereinafter “instant expropriation adjudication”): The object of expropriation: 7,934 square meters of forests and fields, Q29,058 square meters of forests and fields (hereinafter “instant land” in total, and the individual land shall be specified only with its lot number): The compensation amount for losses shall be KRW 535,903,190 in total (the specific details shall be the same as the “adjudication on expropriation” in the attached Table 2 compensation list), the Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) separately request compensation for the value of earth and sand buried in the instant land of this case, which are located in the land of the Gyeongbuk-gun Special Metropolitan City and Chungcheongnam-do Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant expropriation adjudication”): The date of commencement of expropriation: An appraisal corporation: a future and a corporation newly incorporated, a corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “instant ruling”) dated November 20, 2014 - Contents of the ruling: It stated that the total amount of compensation for losses was omitted from the part on the compensation for losses E by the designated parties E.

In addition, the plaintiff et al.'s assertion that the value of earth and sand deposited in the land of this case other than the Selection E is subject to compensation separately, and the selection of comparative standard is applied unfairly, and the compensation is increased. - An appraisal corporation: one appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation, and another appraisal corporation (hereinafter "appraisal", and the result of appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the appraisal of the plaintiff et al., without any dispute, the plaintiff et al., evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including

2. Judgment on the Defendant’s defense prior to the merits

A. The defendant's arguments E is selected.