Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants and the victims D ( South, 61 years old) had a good appraisal due to property inheritance, etc. after the death of the attached E.

1. On March 29, 2012, Defendant A, on the ground that the victim, who attended a family conference at the Jung-gu Daejeon District of Daejeon, attempted to assault a type-type G at around 13:30 on the ground that the victim’s breast at a family meeting, was drinking once, and the head was faced with the floor, and the head was faced with the victim, thereby causing injury to the victim in detail of the number of days of treatment in the number of days of treatment.

2. Defendant B, on the ground that the victim was at the time at the end of the same house at the same time when, on the ground that he was at the time, the victim’s face was taken one time, and inflicted an injury on the victim on the part of the days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement in the first trial record;

1. The defendant B's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. Statement of witness D and I in the second protocol of the trial (excluding the part not trusted in the part not guilty below);

1. The witness J's statement in the second protocol of the trial (the statement to the effect that the victim is faced with his/her physical contact after the defendant B and the victim are contacted);

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate (D, 5 pages of investigation records), inquiry inquiry inquiry report, etc.;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order

1. Defendant A asserts that Defendant A’s act constitutes legitimate self-defense under Article 21 of the Criminal Act, since the victim’s assaulted and attempted to commit violence against G to defend the victim’s defense.

According to the records, the fact that the victim was in a state of sound to G is recognized, but the evidence in the judgment is considered to be comprehensive, i.e., the following circumstances, which are acknowledged at the time.