logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.07.22 2014고단342
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 342"

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving C radar cars;

On August 25, 2014, at around 04:30, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.151%, and driven the road ahead of the “E” main point in Sincho-si, Sincho-si, the Defendant driven the said car to the main point of “E” on the side of his school distance.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the person engaged in driving service with a duty of care to live well in the front, rear, and left and right.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of neglecting this, the part of the right-hand bridge of the victim F(22 years of age) crossing the above road from the left-hand side of the defendant's running direction to the right-hand side of the victim F(22 years of age) who was crossing the above road due to the negligence of neglecting it, and making it difficult to do so.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the above influence of drinking, and caused the victim to undergo a medical treatment for about a week, and the victim was on a bridge with detailed unknown information.

2. Around 04:30 on August 25, 2014, the Defendant driven the said rash in a state of under the influence of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 10 meters from the front of the main point of “Araidinep” located in Cheongwon-si, Young-si to the front point of “E” located in Cheongwon-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.151%.

3. No automobile which is not covered by the mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on the road; and

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as a holder of a radar car that is not covered by mandatory insurance, was driving the car at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

"2014 Highest 388" Defendant, at around 00:30 on October 1, 2014, operated by the victim H in Sincho-si G around 00:30 on October 1, 2014.

arrow