The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case in the absence of consistency with the statements made by the victim B, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. On August 22, 2013, the lower court stated the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined at the lower court and the lower court. ① The victim, upon receiving 12 report on the day of the instant case, stated to the police officer that “the victim was locked, knee and knee, knee, kne, and kn up the kitchen with the victim’s view to leaving the kitchen,” and submitted a statement to the same effect (the investigation record 19, 149 pages), and the police officer made 20:00 on the day of the instant case, the victim 1 was knee and knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, knee, kne, and knee, knee, kneed the victim’s body, and knee, knee, kne, kne, kne, knee, kne, kne.