logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.04.24 2019나1249
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a construction business operator for water leakage detection and water leakage prevention, and the Defendant is a resident of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. From the beginning of June 2017, water leakage occurred in the rear beer of the instant apartment house from around June 2017, which led to the fall of water due to the ceiling of the lower apartment house.

The defendant received a strong claim from the residents of the following floor and examined it through such low-income companies, but did not find the reason for water leakage.

C. On June 12, 2017, the Plaintiff visited the instant apartment by introducing a management office at around 10:30 p.m. around 10:30 p.m.

At the time, the Plaintiff: “A fixed location ought to be confirmed as a leakage detection machine, but is presumed to have been leakage on the side of the floor surface. The Plaintiff removed the body of the Plaintiff, which may be done by construction, and the cost of materials may be added. The construction cost shall exceed at least one million won.”

Although the Defendant thought that the construction cost is somewhat high, the lower floor residents continued to have a strong resistance, and thus, the Defendant agreed to promptly proceed with the construction work, and the Plaintiff visited the instant apartment on June 13, 2017, which is the following day to start the construction work.

However, the Plaintiff was finally found in the boiler on the part of the boiler, which is not the hot waterer or waterer, using the detection device, and completed remuneration by replacing it to the extent that it does not meet the standards in its location, and that it does not meet the standards.

E. After the completion of the above construction, the apartment of this case did not have any further water leakage.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment on the grounds of the claim

A. The Plaintiff started construction after concluding an agreement with the Defendant to take charge of water leakage detection and repair works of the instant apartment, and to receive construction cost of at least one million won with the Defendant, and completed it in a successful manner.

arrow