1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. On April 2, 2018, this Court has regard to cases of applying for a suspension of compulsory execution.

1. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for construction cost as Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2017 Ghana3140.

On May 15, 2017, the above court issued a decision on performance recommendation (hereinafter “decision on performance recommendation of this case”) to the effect that “the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant the amount of KRW 2,500,000 and the amount calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from the day following the day of delivery of a copy of the complaint to the day of full payment.”

The decision on performance recommendation was delivered to the Plaintiff on May 24, 2017, but it became final and conclusive on June 8, 2017 because the Plaintiff did not raise any objection.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, the purport of the whole pleadings, and substantial facts in this court

2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to perform water leakage detection and repair works, but the Defendant did not perform water leakage prevention works because it did not find the cause of water leakage, and the Plaintiff does not bear the obligation to pay the construction cost to the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff for the construction cost of KRW 2,500,000 and damages for delay, and thus, the compulsory execution based on the instant decision of performance recommendation shall be dismissed.

3. 판 단 을 제1 내지 3호증(각 가지번호 포함)의 각 영상 및 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 피고가 원고의 의뢰에 의하여 2016. 11. 26. 인천 동구 샛골로 189 소재 인천서흥초등학교 정문 옆 담장 아래 보도에서 누수 탐지를 위한 장비 및 전문 인력을 투입하여 누수를 탐지하고 그 누수에 대한 차단 조치를 취한 사실, 원고와 피고가 위 누수 탐지 및 보수공사의 대금을 2,500,000원으로 약정한 사실 등이 인정되므로 원고는 피고에게 위 누수탐지 및 보수공사 대금 2,5000,000원 및 이에 대한 지연손해금을 지급할 의무가 있다.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion seeking the denial of compulsory execution based on the decision of execution recommendation of this case is without merit.

4. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.