Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a rocketing taxi for business purposes.

On November 16, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi at a speed of 20km per hour in the direction of the Eunpyeong-gu Office in the direction of large 3:00 on November 16, 2014, and turned back the reverse village street in 111 as the promotion of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Since the location is where crosswalks are installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service has a road by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected this and proceeded by the bypassing the right side of the defendant's vehicle, he did not find the victim D (72 years old) who walked the crosswalk from the right side of the defendant's vehicle to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signals, but did not find the victim D (72 years old) and received the part of the victim's left-hand bridge in front of the right side of the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the mouths, closure, etc. of the Hashes Hashes' Hashes' Hashes' Hashes that do not need approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first trial record;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the defendant's negligence in sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the degree of injury of the victim, etc., the defendant's liability for the crime is not less specific, although not agreed with the victim, the defendant is affiliated with the taxi mutual aid association, the defendant is against the defendant, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the argument of this case are considered.