Text
All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B and Defendant A are irrelevant to each other, and Defendant A and the victim C are the same line and the latter line.
Defendant
B1) On September 4, 2018, at around 21:00, the Defendant assaulted the victim C (the 57 years old), who appeared to take the drinking in a cooling and cooling house, on the ground that the victim C (the 76 years old) who appeared to take the drinking in a cooling and without disregarding it, said that “the principal would be why he would be fright to take the drinking.” The Defendant assaulted the victim A (the 57 years old) at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a) on the ground that the victim C (the 57 years old), who was fright to take the drinking in a cooling and cooling house, was fright to take the face of the victim’s body.
B. Defendant A observed the appearance of the victim B(59 years of age) to C when and at the same time and place as the above paragraph A above, the victim B(59 years of age) was aware of, and assaulted by the victim B’s head debt, leading the victim B’s head debt, leading the victim B to the outside and the face several times.
2. Each of the facts charged of the instant case is a crime under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be punished against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. On July 18, 2019, after the institution of the instant indictment, the victim C and A expressed their intention not to be punished against Defendant B, and the victim B expressed their intention not to be punished against Defendant A.
Therefore, all of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.