logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.11.12 2019구합8024
주거이전비등
Text

1. The Defendant: 19,435,135 won to Plaintiff A; 21,730,797 won to Plaintiff B; 19,435,135 won to Plaintiff C; and 17,753.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 28, 2006, the head of Ulsan Central District Office published the residents' public inspection of the Jung-gu Seoul Central District G G workers in Ulsan Central District as E improvement zone (hereinafter "the improvement zone in this case"), and on August 23, 2007, the Ulsan Central City Mayor published the improvement zone as H in the public announcement of Ulsan Metropolitan City on August 23, 2007.

B. The Defendant is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership that implements the E-Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project implemented in the instant rearrangement zone (hereinafter “instant rearrangement project”). On November 10, 201, the Defendant obtained authorization from the head of Ulsan-gu, the head of the Gu and obtained authorization to implement the project on January 11, 201, and on the same day, the said authorization was publicly notified as Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

C. On November 13, 2013, the Plaintiff acquired ownership by inheritance of the said house from the spouse K, which was the owner of the said house (the total floor area of the instant one is 108.1 square meters; hereinafter “instant one house”) located within the rearrangement zone in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, and the ownership of the said house. The Plaintiff B was the owner of the housing of two stories above ground (the total floor area of the instant housing is 11.53 square meters; hereinafter “instant two houses”) located within the rearrangement zone, and the Plaintiff C was the owner of the housing of two stories above the instant housing and two stories above the instant housing (the total floor area of the housing was 11.5 square meters, 124.95 square meters; hereinafter “instant three housing”) located within the rearrangement zone, and the Plaintiff D was the owner of each of the instant housing and two stories below the total floor area of the instant housing located within the area of the instant rearrangement project.

Plaintiff

A, along with his childO, resided in the instant house 1 from around 1989 to June 15, 2019. Plaintiff B, along with his spouse P and children Q, resided in the instant house 2 from around 2001 to May 23, 2019.

arrow