1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

(a) A summary of the rearrangement project - Business name: D housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as "maintenance project in this case"): Defendant - The location and size of the rearrangement zone - The public announcement date of the public inspection of the rearrangement plan - The scale and size of the rearrangement zone - the area of the Gwangju Northern-gu E-2,269 square meters - July 25, 2012: April 4, 2017 (F of the public announcement of the North Korean Metropolitan City in the Gwangju Metropolitan City): The approval date of the management and disposal plan: November 16, 2017 (Public Notification of the North Korean Metropolitan City in the Gwangju Metropolitan City): the date of adjudication of expropriation: August 9, 2018 (the date of commencement of expropriation on September 21, 2018).

B. Plaintiff A resided as the owner of the H2-story housing located within the instant improvement project zone, and gave birth on March 6, 2019. Plaintiff B resided as the owner of the Y I housing located within the instant improvement project zone (hereinafter “each of the instant housing”). Plaintiff B resided as the owner of the Gwangju North-gu I housing located within the instant improvement project zone (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) on March 21, 2019.

(c)

Plaintiff

C On June 2, 1994, the Plaintiff filed a move-in report on the house in B’s port owned by the Plaintiff, and was transferred to J apartment and K on April 30, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Eul evidence No. 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Plaintiff A, Plaintiff A, and B are the owners of residential buildings located in the instant improvement zone, and have owned each of the instant housing from July 25, 2012 to August 9, 2018, which was the date the public inspection of the instant improvement plan was announced.

Therefore, the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 12,00,00, and KRW 3,703,496, and KRW 17,268,80,00 in total, and KRW 17,268,80,00 in the amount of KRW 12,00,00 in the resettlement settlement money, KRW 3,703,496 in the amount of the relocation settlement money, KRW 17,00 in the amount of KRW 17,07,910 in the aggregate of KRW 1,304,42, and KRW 17,07,910 in the amount of the relocation subsidy, and the delayed damages therefrom.

B. Plaintiff C shall move to the Republic of Korea due to the implementation of the instant improvement project.