logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.04.14 2016고정245
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant was aware that he had been in common.

In addition to B, the Daejeon Credit Guarantee Foundation issued a false credit guarantee certificate to a low-credit self-employed person with weak collateral and offered a loan to receive a loan after receiving a false credit guarantee certificate from a financial institution.

On November 1, 2009, the Defendant was issued a false registration certificate with the false content of “D” from the above-mentioned location in Daejeon, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, as if he operated a mobile phone sales store in the name of “D” from “D,” and on November 20, 2009 at the Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, the Defendant was issued a false registration certificate as if he had operated the said “D” from August 10, 2009.

On December 1, 2009, the Defendant, at Daejeon Credit Guarantee Foundation, written an application for credit guarantee with the aforementioned indication as if he/she operated D, and filed an application for credit guarantee with the employee in charge of the dry field Saemaul Saemaul Cooperative, who was entrusted with its business by the Daejeon Credit Guarantee Foundation on the same day, submitted relevant documents, such as the above application, lease contract, and business registration certificate, and applied for a loan with the credit guarantee

However, the defendant did not have operated the "D" upon entering into a lease contract for the above domicile building as above, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan normally even after receiving the loan due to the lack of economic circumstances at the time.

As above, the Defendant conspired with the above B, by deceiving a person who is an employee in charge of the victimized person, and received KRW 15 million from the injured person on December 10, 2009 as a loan around December 10, 2009.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of loan documents, such as an application for credit guarantee);

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from a lessor of a project);

arrow