logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2013. 07. 19. 선고 2013누6086 판결
납세자가 아닌 제3자의 재산을 대상으로 한 압류처분은 그 처분의 내용이 법률상 실현될 수 없는 것이어서 당연무효임[국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2012Guhap28100 ( October 04, 2013)

Title

Disposition of seizure on the property of a third party who is not a taxpayer shall be null and void as it is impossible to legally realize the contents of such disposition.

Summary

Even if national taxes are imposed on the truster in relation to the trust property, if the properties are not seized before the trust under the Trust Act takes place, the taxation claim cannot be viewed as falling under the "right arising from the cause before the trust" under the proviso of Article 21 (1) of the Trust Act, which exceptionally permits the compulsory execution or auction against the trust

Cases

2013Nu6086 Nullification of attachment disposition

Plaintiff, Appellant

AAA Corporation

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Head of the District Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap28100 decided January 4, 2013

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 21, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

July 19, 2013

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim

Attachment disposition issued by the Defendant on May 14, 2012 regarding the real estate listed in the separate sheet (1) and attachment disposition taken on June 8, 2012 as to the incidental sheet (2) is confirmed to be invalid, respectively. The judgment of the first instance court on the purport of appeal shall be revoked, and the Plaintiff’s claim shall be dismissed.

Reasons

The reason for this decision is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. If so, and the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow