A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was engaged in manufacturing business, such as mobile phone cases, as the operator of 303 location D (State) D at the time of harmony, and continued to operate the business by leasing the F business place located in E at the time of harmony.

1. In around October 2014, the Defendant, at the above (State) F Office, to the victim G, an employee of the above (State) F Office, “only if the production was completed and delivery was made with the mobile phone application,” and there is a financial problem. As such, the Defendant would have lent money necessary for the distribution of the mobile phone case to the victim G, who is an employee of the said (State).

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the fact that a large quantity of the mobile phone case manufactured by the defendant was inferior and thus it was impossible to distribute it normally, and the intention was not to use the borrowed money for the manufacture or distribution of the mobile phone case, but to use it for the personal purpose, and there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money due to the absence of other revenues or assets.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; and (b) obtained the Defendant’s credit cooperative account (I) in the name of the Defendant’s wife from the victim on October 17, 2014, 500,000 won around October 21, 2014; (c) 2,50,000 won around October 23, 2014; (d) 200,000 won around November 1, 2014; and (e) obtained the Defendant’s credit bank account in the name of the Defendant’s wife from the victim on the pretext of borrowing money in connection with the mobile phone case business; and (e) acquired the Defendant’s credit amount from the victim on November 3, 2014 to KRW 8,00,000 around November 5, 2014; and (e) acquired the Defendant’s credit amount of KRW 05,00,005,005,005; and

2. On December 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the foregoing ( state) office, at the victim G’s office, “in the event of the cock project to be supplied to the taxi mutual aid association, the Defendant would incur a maximum of KRW 70 million to KRW 80 million; and (b) if the Defendant additionally lent money necessary for the cock’s business, he would be paid up to the previous cocks in lump sum.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not at the stage of receiving orders from the taxi Financial Cooperative.