logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고정2504
모욕
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 18:30 on May 2, 2016, Defendant B committed the crime of Defendant B, on the part of the F restaurant located in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, sent a bath without any justifiable reason by having a customer enter the restaurant, and sent to the restaurant after having received a report, Defendant B’s scambling, and Defendant B’s scambling to the surrounding customers and police officers for about 20 minutes, such as threatening G and scambling that “I will come to see this dog, I will go to go to go to scam, I will go to go to go to go to scam, and threatening that I will exercise assault, etc., for about 20 minutes of 20 minutes of time, such as threatening G, scambling, and exerting influence on the police officers performing official duties.

2. 피고인 A의 범행 피고인 A는 제1항과 같은 일시 및 장소에서 피고인 B와 같은 일행으로 들어와 신고를 받고 출동한 경사 G, 경장 H에게 "저 새끼 깡패 아냐, 야 이 깡패새끼야, 경찰관이면 다야 이 개새끼들아, 저 새끼 눈깔 좀 봐봐, 죽여버려"라며 욕설을 하고 경사 G의 가슴팍을 치고 달려들 듯 위협하는 등 약 20여분에 걸쳐 정당한 공무수행 중인 경찰관들에게 입에 담을 수 없는 욕설과 위력을 행사하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to voice recording files;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow