The accused shall publicly announce the summary of the judgment of innocence.

1. On July 2015, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim by deeming the Defendant as land owner and allowing the Defendant to remove the iron pole, which is the victim F, in D, a police officer of the Republic of Korea, who was aware of the fact that the fire was the owner of the building in question.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted by this court and completed the examination of evidence, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) in the name of G, the victim of the instant house, the ownership registration was completed; (b) a fire was occurred on the 50.72 square meters of the house of H H 2 in the name of G, the victim of the instant house; and (c) the scrap pole of the instant house was removed by the water merchant E; and (d) the Defendant, the land owner of the said house, the landowner of the said house, stated that E would be well aware of the

On the other hand, according to the evidence above, the village president entrusted the victim's side and proposed the removal of the above house roof to E. The village president confirmed the quantity of solid water in order to secure solid water to be generated after the removal, and the village president ordered E to remove the roof, and then ordered E to remove the core boiler, container, gate, etc., and then ordered E to remove it. However, from the point of view of E, E stated that E would have received the first direction from the roof that E would have the removal of the remaining house after subtracting the above three parts of the house. Since the first direction of the village president was to have the removal of the bar boiler in order to remove the stove the stove in order to remove the stove in order to remove the s to remove the stove in the stove boiler, container, and gate, it was well known that E would have not been able to remove the stove before the removal of the stove.