Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

The Defendant was a member of C Committee, D, under the direction of E of the removal company president, to remove the house.

Persons and victims F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim company”) are the owners of buildings located on the G land in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) adjacent to the housing during the aforementioned removal work.

D Around November 16, 2017, around 07:30, the head of the management division of the victim company suspended the removal work under the H’s provision of the said provision. Around November 16, 2017, D was engaged in the work of removing the housing in the vicinity of G land of the Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-si

Since then, D has contacted E, and E has requested the defendant to confirm the scene.

On November 16, 2017, the Defendant, at around 11:00 on November 16, 2017, to H at the site of removal of the house adjacent to the G land in Changpo-gu, Changpo-gu, Changpo-si, Changpo-si, Changpo-si. “I cannot resolve any matter arising from misunderstanding of the wall’s house attached to the house subject to removal.

I would like to see the understanding.

The phrase “to permit the removal of a building to remove a neighboring wall.” The phrase “to permit the removal of a building.”

However, H is "under the law."

“The Defendant refused the Defendant’s request.”

Nevertheless, the defendant " has been talked well" against D.

In other words, construction should begin again.

“Along with the fact that the issue was resolved smoothly, D, who believe that the market price was not known, destroyed approximately 2/3 of the wall of the instant building, which was owned by the victim company, by requiring D to attach all the remaining fences.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of DNA by the police;

1. Statement statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of H’s Acts and subordinate statutes on the complaint;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.