Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant driven a non-registered faton (100c) without obtaining a motor device bicycle license, from approximately 800 meters to the 6-way village of the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

2. No one shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who did not purchase mandatory insurance, operated the above Oral Ba as provided in the preceding paragraph.

3. No driver of any motor vehicle shall pass along a bicycle lane except places where traffic is permitted with safety signs;

Nevertheless, at around 11:00 on October 08, 2015, the Defendant shocked the bicycles driven by the victim C from the negligence that she was driving on the front of the village 6 complex in the Jung-dong, Jungdong-gu, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, in order to drive a bicycle on the front side of the village.

결국 피고인은 위와 같은 업무상의 과실로 자전거 락 샷 등 수리비 약 144만 원 상당이 들도록 위 자전거를 손괴하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. A traffic accident report and the ledger of driver's licenses for motor vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to skins and damaged bicycle photographs;

1. Relevant Article 154 subparagraph 2 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 154 and Article 43 (Unlicensed Driving) of the Road Act, Article 46 (2), Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Loss, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is seriously against the defendant, and the fact that the defendant is an old and basic living recipient