logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.02.08 2016고단228
사기등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A was involved in the sale of the above hotel upon request of D, the owner of the hotel C in Jeju, and Defendant B was the wife of the above D.

1. The Defendants: (a) around June 18, 2015, at the F Office of Defendant A’s operation located in Jeju Island, the Defendants: (b) presented the present tenant of the said hotel to the victim G who sought to purchase the said hotel from D; and (c) agreed to H with 100 million won as premium, despite having agreed to give H a premium of KRW 100 million under the name of the premium, the Defendants received more money from the victimized person as premium; and (d) agreed to the victim with H at the intervals of KRW 200 million as premium.

A false statement was made.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and delivered a total of KRW 200 million on June 18, 2015, including KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 to H as premium to be paid from the injured party for H, and around that time, paid KRW 135,00,000 as premium, and acquired the difference in property benefits equivalent to KRW 65,00,000.

2. Around June 18, 2015, Defendant B drafted a written confirmation with H that the said H will pay 100 million won to H as premium at the I hotel coffee shop at the Jeju city.

Defendant

B, after doing so, for the purpose of exercising at the J Office in Jeju-si, J. E, without authority, revised “100 million won” as “20 million won” as stated in the said letter without authority.

As a result, the Defendant changed one copy of H’s letter of confirmation (Evidence No. 17 pages) which is a private document on the proof of facts.

3. The Defendant is expected to pay KRW 200 million for the premium to the said G while he/she was in custody of “written confirmation” in the name of H, the amount of which was modified from the preceding F Office in the middle of July 2015, which was then in custody by the Defendant’s alteration of the premium amount from the preceding F Office.

It is well known that the above-mentioned letter of confirmation has been altered while making a false representation.

arrow