A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

No. 1 (one seal), No. 2 (two re-certificates) of seized evidence.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. On October 2012, the Defendant stated to C that “B is the Head of the Special Government Service of the NIS, who is the Head of the Government Service, and may recommend employees to the NIS, which would be used for employment when preparing resident registration, etc., abstracts and documents,” and that “The process of recommendation is a selection process and the primary document is completed at the time of receipt of the first document. The external process is reported to the head of the office and the Vice-head and completed all of them.”

On November 2012, the Defendant continued to make a false statement that “C’s father D’s father and victim D were almost finally confirmed at the close restaurant of the Sejong Culture Center located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul. When signing a membership, the Defendant is required to bear the expenses because he/she is required to perform his/her duties like the head of the office and the vice-head.”

However, the facts are that the defendant was not the head of the three team team leader of the NIS, and there was no intention or ability to employ C as the NIS because he/she was not the head of the three team team leader.

As above, the Defendant deceiving the victim D and caused the victim D to settle liquor payments, food service merchandise payments, clothing payments, etc. by the victim D’s card, and received a total of KRW 17,460,270 as shown in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 67 by means of account transfer.

B. The Defendant had the victim C by deceiving him to find employment at the same time and place as the date and time set forth in the above 1-A, and received a total of KRW 1,210,000 as shown in the separate sheet Nos. 68 through 73 of the crime sight table from the victim C.

C. On December 28, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, stating that “The Defendant would rent a vehicle through a person who is an employee of the National Quota, but will succeed to the name of the lease within one to two months, if the lease is lent, the lease fee will be internal, and the cost will be paid from the NIS.”

However, the defendant did not have any way to succeed to the name of lease at the time.