logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.10.02 2015고합93
강도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years and by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 4, 2015, from around 02:30 to around 09:30, the Defendant, along with C and D, carried four studio buildings 104 and one person’s card using Trum card 52, and 1 to four studio cards via three times. In the case where the pattern of non-type and number of four studio of the card in the last possession are different, the Defendant ambling that the sum of the sales amount is equal to three million won by a person with the lowest number in comparison with one other in the method of becoming the winner.

2. At around 09:30 on March 4, 2015, the robbery Defendant: (a) thought that the victim was making a fraudulent gambling with the victim C (the age of 54) while gambling together with the above gambling, the Defendant: (b) thought that the victim was committing the said gambling; (c) told the victim to cut off the board money from the victim; and (d) told F, “Ig, f.,” who was a part of society where he was on the said job, let the victim take it back from the back; and (d) caused F to prevent the victim from leaving the victim back; and (e) prevented the victim from resisting the victim’s face at one time; and (e) took 1.5 million won prior to the victim’s property against the victim.

3. On March 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant’s mobile phone device, which was located in the process of withdrawing money from C around the place described in paragraph (1) around the o’s o’s p.m.; and (b) found the Defendant’s mobile phone device located in the process of gaining money from C, as described in paragraph (2), and used one set of Samsung G(55 years of age)-based mobile phone devices equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 in the market price

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Entry of each statement in the suspect examination protocol (defendants, C and Examination) as to F prepared by the public prosecutor;

1. Each statement made by the police officer of the suspect interrogation protocol (D, C, F and Examination) of the accused;

1. Each protocol of interrogation of suspect for police preparation G, C, and D, respectively.

arrow