A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 28, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year, for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (organization and activity of organization, etc.), for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury), for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury), and for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence), for six months, for violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (organization and activity of organization, etc.) due to the admission of a criminal organization at the Seoul High Court on November 14, 2013 after appeal by the Defendant, and six months, for six months, for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (organization and activity of organization, etc.), for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury), for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint violence) due to the occupation of a criminal organization and activity at the Incheon District Court on August 28, 2013, and the Defendant appealed from the Supreme Court on January 29, 2014.

B, C, D, and name uncertainty were used from around 23:0 on April 12, 2013 to around 04:00 on the 13:00 of the same month by using 52 card units from the second floor office of the building located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, to first hold four card units per capita, and then have three-time cards changed by one to four card units, and finally, in the case where the number of four pages of the card last possession is different, a person with the lowest number who is the largest number compared each other was 70 times in a way that he/she becomes the winner.

The Defendant, while being aware of the fact that the above B et al. gambles as above at the above time and at the above place, provided drinking water, which is the role of “nicking”, so as to assist him in gambling, thereby facilitating his gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B, and C