A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2013, at around 00:10, the Defendant, in front of the “C” located in the Jungdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, opened a house exhauster of E in front of his workplace D and body fighting. Upon receiving a report from 112, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender on the 22th day of the same month, and was arrested by the police officer dispatched as a flagrant offender on the 09:23rd day of the same month.

The Defendant was investigated as a suspect in the property damage case from the Seoul Central Tran Police Station criminal and the assistant F, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Central Tran Police Station, and the Defendant stated the personal information and resident registration number of the sentence as if he was the Defendant’s punishment, and stated the G as the suspect, with the aim of exercising the F’s right to refuse to make statements in the suspect interrogation protocol prepared by him as the suspect, and exercising the F’s signature by stating the “G” in the front statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol as “G” and presenting it to F without knowledge of the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of the interrogation protocol of G name and the existence of such protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (A’s false statement in interrogation);

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;