A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On May 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution as a crime of fraud at the Suwon Giwon, and such judgment became final and conclusive on May 20, 2017.

【Criminal facts” The Defendant is the actual operator of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”) which carries on the Do and retail business of chemical drugs.

On December 28, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the victim effective capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) in the name of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co.”), to address the E-car owned by the victim Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) with the rent of 58,283,170 won per month, the lease period of 48 months, the deposit of 17,485,00 won, the vehicle amount of 58,283,170 won, the vehicle amount of 58,280 won, the vehicle amount of 58,283,170 won owned by the victim Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co.”), and received the above loan from the creditor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.) to compensate for the above debt of the said passenger Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.) and received the above loan from the creditor Co.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Lease contract, registration certificate, and certificate of deposit verification;

1. Previous conviction: Judgment on the inquiry of summary information of the case and the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel

1. The obligees in the name of the claimant could not use the vehicle key in the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. against the defendant's will, without permission, to use the vehicle key in the office of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and bring it to the obligees.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the defendant was in arrears with the lease fee of the above passenger vehicle since January 2015, which was operated by the defendant. At the time, the defendant was aware of the procedure on the return of the above passenger vehicle.