logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.11.10 2017노1125
상해등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months, by imprisonment for up to four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (defendant D: 10 months of imprisonment, 2 years of probation, 80 hours of community service, 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of probation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants, who are cargo transport workers, jointly destroyed the cargo trucks, which are the means of livelihood of the victims, on the ground that the victims of the instant case, who are the same cargo transport workers, did not participate in the transportation refusal, and Defendant D was injured by the victims W. Defendant D and E interfered with the K transport business of the K transport business of the KU. The Defendants followed their opinions, and there is little possibility of criticism because they mobilized violent methods for the purpose of resolving the dispute, and most victims, who are the same cargo transport workers, appear to have suffered considerable damage due to the instant crime, should be punished strictly.

However, on the other hand, the defendants recognized the whole of the mistakes and agreed with most victims in the court below, and agreed to the AS and AJ additionally with the victim of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (damage to joint property, etc.) for the first time in the trial. The victims of each of the crimes of this case do not want punishment against the defendants, the contract of carriage entered into with N is terminated and the BA entered into a new transport contract with the transport company such as BA, etc., without presenting the unit price set to the defendants, and the BA, etc. presented a unit price lower than the existing transport unit price to the transport company such as B, etc., and the defendants requested the disclosure of the unit price or the unit price per transport to the transport company such as the LA and B, etc., and the defendants supported their family members.

arrow