beta
Text
1. The defendant shall receive, on April 11, 2005, the Suwon District Court 595 square meters of forest land B in Sungsung-si.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. B forest land B (i.e., 595 square meters; hereinafter “instant real estate”) was assessed by C around 1919 around 191.
B. The Defendant completed the registration of initial ownership on the instant real estate by the Suwon District Court, the Sungsung Branch Registry of April 11, 2005, No. 46047.
C. On May 10, 1949, the Plaintiff’s father-child C died and succeeded solely to the family head and the heir of the property. D was the heir of D, who died without marriage on August 10, 1950, and E was the spouse of F, children G, H, I, I, and J, who died on December 24, 1979, and became co-inheritors.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Gap evidence 2-1 to 4, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, and Gap evidence 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Any person registered in the Land Survey Book as an owner shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive by taking into account the circumstances as the owner of the land or forest so long as there is no reflective evidence such as the change in the situation by the adjudication, etc., and shall acquire the relevant land or forest arbitrarily, if it is found that a person other than the title holder of the preservation registration has been in the situation of the relevant land, and if it is found that a person other than the title holder of the preservation registration has been in the situation of the relevant land, the registration
In full view of the following circumstances, the evidence as seen earlier and the fact-finding of K Myeon and the head of Dong Dong branch office of this court, which can be seen by adding to the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the fact-finding of each fact-finding with respect to the real estate of this case, namely, the fact-finding and the Plaintiff’s co-ordination are the same as the Chinese name, and the legal domicile of the Plaintiff C, the legal domicile of the Plaintiff’s co-ordination, is the same as the location of the real estate of this case, and the unit of Ri, as the Plaintiff’s co-ordination, at the time of the circumstances regarding the real estate of this case, the Plaintiff’s co-ordination and Dong did not p