logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.12.12 2017가단53201
계약금 등 반환청구
Text

1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is a person operating an international marriage brokerage office under the trade name of “E”, and Defendant D is a person who has worked as an intermediary at the above marriage counseling center for about one year from around December 2015.

B. On June 4, 2016, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, around June 12, 2016, entered into an international marriage arrangement agreement with Defendant C as follows (hereinafter “each of the instant contracts”). A’s contracts are classified into each of the instant contracts, and Plaintiff B’s contracts were fully paid each of the instant contracts to the Defendants according to each of the instant contracts.

Contents: The intermediary payment of KRW A5,500,000 for a national woman of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (hereinafter referred to as the "Vietnam") and the brokerage commission for international marriage brokerage: KRW 16,50,000 for the payment of KRW A5,000 for the payment of KRW B3,000 for the payment of KRW 7 days before departure: The remainder of KRW A6,000 for the payment of KRW B10,000 for the payment of KRW B10,000 for the payment of KRW 7 days before departure: The remainder of KRW 5,500 for the payment of KRW 3,500 for the personal use of KRW 3,500 for the plaintiff B,500 for the payment of KRW 00 for the payment of KRW 7 days after departure.

1. New dormitory expenses;

2. New departments (four months), educational expenses;

3. Newly Inserted by Act No. 1000,

4. Personal expenses for vagabonds (2nd visit).

다. 피고 D의 주선에 따라, 원고 A은 2016. 7. 29.경 베트남 하이퐁시에 있는 맞선 장소에서 베트남 국적의 F와 맞선을 보고 다음 날 결혼식을 올렸고, 원고 B도 2016. 9. 8.경 베트남 국적의 G과 결혼식을 올렸다.

G enters around April 7, 2017 and is married with Plaintiff B.

The Plaintiffs filed a complaint against the Defendants for the violation of the Act on the Management of Fraud and Marriage Brokerage Business (hereinafter “Marriage Brokerage Business Act”) upon the request of the Defendants for the destruction of each of the instant contracts after completing their marriage awareness as above.

The defendants were subject to disposition that most of the suspicions were suspected, but the personal information of the opposite party against the plaintiffs is the personal information of the opposite party.

arrow