All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff and the counterclaim filed in the trial are dismissed.

after the filing of an appeal.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

In fact, C is a person operating an international marriage brokerage office under the trade name of “D,” and the Plaintiff is a person who has worked as a broker at the above marriage counseling center for about one year from December 2015 to around one year.

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant entered into an international marriage arrangement contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) as indicated below with C as the Plaintiff’s intermediary, and paid down payment and intermediate payment to C pursuant to the instant contract.

Contents: 16,50,000 won intermediate payment of KRW 3,000: 10,000 (payment seven days before departure) intermediate payment of KRW 10,000: 3,500,000 (payment within seven days from the date of departure) personal use (payment within seven days from the date of departure) and additional taxes;

1. New dormitory expenses;

2. New departments (four months), educational expenses;

3. Newly Inserted by Act No. 1000,

4. On September 5, 2016, according to the recommendation of the Plaintiff’s personal expenses, the Defendant reported the E-Relations of Vietnam’s nationality at a double line located in Mannam City on September 5, 2016 and made a marriage ceremony on the following day.

On September 10, 2016, the defendant left Vietnam and entered Korea.

After completing the marriage ceremony as above, the Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff and C for the violation of the Act on the Management of Fraud and Marriage Brokerage Business (hereinafter “Marriage Business Act”).

Plaintiff

And C was subject to most of the suspicions, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,500,000 as a violation of the Marriage Brokers Business Act with respect to the portion not certified as a notary public of Vietnam while providing the personal information of the opposite party to the defendant, etc.

【Military District Court 201, 339, 2018, 31, 39(combined), and 39(Consolidated) of Jeonju District Court 2017, 339(Joint), 2018, 39(Consolidated). 【The grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8, and evidence Nos. 2 and 3 of judgment as to the grounds for filing the principal suit.