logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2014.09.23 2013가단216319
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a woman of the net C.

On the other hand, the defendant inherited C's children and C's property.

B. 1) On April 17, 2011, the Defendant: (a) each letter stating that “I will pay to the Plaintiff the rice (including D’s life) containing D’s life. Also, at the time of sale, I will pay the prescribed amount” (No. 2 of this case; hereinafter “each letter of this case”).

(2) On April 18, 201, the Defendant, after drawing up the instant letter, paid KRW 27 million to the Plaintiff on April 18, 201.

C.1) As to the land of thischeon-si, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the C on July 6, 1971, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of H on November 14, 1995 due to the inheritance due to the division in consultation (i.e., August 11, 1993). The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Defendant on February 2, 1999 (i.e., January 25, 1999). After the Defendant sold the above land to the Korea FF Distribution Logistics Co.,, Ltd. on December 14, 2010, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Korea FF Distribution Logistics Co., Ltd. (i. 2) on the land of thischeon-si (i.e., the land of this case plus the land of this case), and (ii) on the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of the Korea FF on April 19, 1994).

3) With respect to each of the instant lands, each of the instant lands was established on August 30, 1996 by the debtor and Machi Agricultural Cooperative as the mortgagee. The Plaintiff repaid KRW 15 million to Mchie Agricultural Cooperative on behalf of G, and on February 2, 1999, the registration of ownership transfer was cancelled on February 2, 199 when the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant’s future. [Grounds for Recognition] The facts that there was no dispute, Gap’s evidence 1, 2, and Eul’s evidence 1 through 4 (tentative number).

arrow