beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On October 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daegu District Court’s Ansan Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence in the first prison of the North North Korean defectors on May 28, 2017.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Fraud;
A. On October 2, 2018, at around 00:20 on October 2, 2018, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay the said amount even if he/she was provided 2 soldiers and 2 female-friendly women-related women with 3,50,000 won as the Defendant did not pay the said amount even though he/she had no intention or ability to pay the drinking value, etc., in the “D” room for the operation of the Victim C (B) located in Ansan-dong-dong-dong-si.
B. On October 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 02:45, Oct. 14, 2018, 2018, committed the crime: (b) around 02:45, 2018; and (c) at the studio 2, “H” where G is an employee, the Defendant was engaged in as if he/she did not have an intent or an ability to pay the drinking value, etc.; and (d) he/she was provided with one disease in the amount of KRW 2.60,00,000 from G and one female-do woman-friendly, thereby acquiring the same pecuniary profit.
The facts charged are partially revised and recognized to the effect that "victim G" is changed to "victim F within the extent that it is not likely to substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense."
2. On October 3, 2018, from around 20:30 to 21:10 on the same day, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, sent the Defendant’s mobile phone from the “K” operated by the Victim J (S) Department (SK) located in Ansan-dong-si, to the effect that he/she could not return his/her mobile phone before he/she received the alcohol value, and that he/she could not return his/her mobile phone; however, he/she expressed that he/she could not avoid disturbance by force by avoiding disturbance, such as: (a) taking the Defendant’s mobile phone from the Defendant’s mobile phone from around 20:30 to around 21:10 on the same day.
We interfere with protection operations.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;