A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall pay 1,920,000 won to the applicant for compensation.

3.2

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On April 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months for fraud at the Daegu District Court on April 13, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated in the Daegu Prison on March 22, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:40 on November 17, 2013, the fact in F, operated by the Victim E in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, was committed as if he would normally pay the drinking value despite having no intention or ability to pay the drinking value; and (b) the Defendant ordered both weeks, etc.; and (c) the Defendant was provided by the Victim G’s employees with the total of KRW 860,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, such as two weeks and ten bottles, and did not pay the amount.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

On September 25, 2013, the Defendant, “2014 Highest 892,” despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the drinking value in “I” operated by the Victim C in the Daegu Suwon-gu H, Daegu, issued orders to both states, etc. as if they would normally pay the drinking value. Accordingly, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table, such as being provided five diseases in total amount equivalent to 6.80,00 won of the market price from the date to October 16, 2013, did not pay the said amount, even though he/she was provided with alcoholic beverages equivalent to 2.170,00 won in total from the two victims on four occasions from the date to October 16, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving victims, acquired a total amount of 2170,000 won property interest.

On April 30, 2014, the Defendant: “L” operated by the Victim K in Guro-gu Seoul High Court on April 30, 2014, was engaged in as if he would pay the drinking value in a normal manner despite having no intent or ability to pay the drinking value; and the Defendant ordered the two weeks, etc.; and even if he was provided by the Defendant’s employees M, he did not pay the amount equivalent to the total market value of KRW 352,00,000.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

(i) the evidence;