Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 24, 2016, the Defendant, at around 19:20 on April 24, 2016, expressed that he would not operate the said taxi by driving the victim’s taxi on a commercial taxi operated by the victim B without any justifiable reason at the lane 617-2 located in Jung-gu, Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and that he would throw off the said taxi at approximately 20 minutes of the said taxi so that he could not operate the said taxi by avoiding disturbance, such as caring the said taxi, and thereby interfere with the victim’s operation by force.

2. The Defendant damaged property by putting the cab on the cab owned by the victim B at the above time, at the above place, and by putting the cab on the cab on the cab owned by the victim B into a flick, thereby causing the flick repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning photographs and estimates by cutting booms and video images to cover them;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the defendant's mistake, and the victim B does not want the defendant's punishment, the defendant's previous conviction relation (not subject to severe punishment exceeding the fine), life relation (career of volunteer service), health condition (complication) etc. shall be determined in the same manner as the disposition is comprehensively taken into account.