logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.08.31 2017고정768
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 31, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) on the ground that the Defendant: (b) “Blue light blue light on the frontway” located in 19, Seocheon-si, 275-ro 275, the Defendant, the Defendant, and the Defendant, and the Defendant, or the said C, voluntarily stopped the said taxi on the side of the said taxi on a yearly date, on the ground that: (c) the Defendant or the said C stopped the said taxi on the side, with his own discretion during the said taxi operation route; and (d) on the ground that the Defendant or the said C stopped the said taxi on the side, even if it is not a destination, there was a damage to the said taxi by walking the back portion of the front part of the flue of the said taxi on the back; and (d) by destroying the said taxi to ensure that the repair cost is 371,620 won.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim E, who is an engineer of the said taxi, in a large interest; (b) took the victim as he/she was fluored; and (c) fluoring the said taxi, caused the disturbance between about 20 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the cab operation of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E (List 17);

1. A written estimate (List 19);

1. A criminal investigation report (List 22);

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (list 9,24);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Optional fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was confession, reflectivity, and criminal records of the same kind, and the victims were not subject to any criminal punishment for the past eight years. The victims were not subject to punishment by mutual consent.

arrow