The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant is not against the nature of the crime by escaping after causing a traffic accident while driving under the influence of alcohol and alcohol level of 0.140%.

However, the degree of damage caused by the instant accident is relatively minor.

Defendant

A driver vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant does not want to punish the defendant by agreement with the victims.

The Defendant committed the instant crime in depth and did not repeat the crime.

In addition, considering all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act as the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the following judgment is rendered again after pleading.

Criminal facts

The summary of the facts charged and the evidence admitted by the court are the same as the entries in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime at issue;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( considered in the preceding favorable circumstances);

1. As seen earlier, Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides for the suspension of execution.