1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On May 8, 2014, the facts of recognition B entrusted the Defendant with the disposal of waste glass fibers, etc. arising from the removal process C.

(2) The contract of this case contains a description of “waste-type waste, waste-type waste-based, unit waste-based, unit waste-based, unit price of 1,400,000” as the title “amount of waste and waste treatment.”

At the first site, the Defendant had 35lubes and 40lubes stuffed at the site, and if the factory wastes are stored in the aforesaidlubes, the Defendant transferred the wastes in the above 25 tons of truck to the Defendant, and disposed of wastes by means of transporting them to the waste disposal business entity upon confirmation by the field manager (D or E division) in B.

By simplificationing the procedure, B omitted the process of piling wastes into the 40lubebes, and the Defendant changed the 25 tons truck to the 25 tons truck to the 25 tons truck as the waste discharged.

From May 2014 to November 20, 2014, the Defendant carried out waste disposal work (round November 20, 2014, the Defendant transferred the right to remove to the Daeung Industries Development Co., Ltd., and the Defendant thereafter carried out waste disposal work for Daeung Industries Development). The Defendant treated 25 tons of dump trucks in June 2014, 15th in July 2014, 201, 15th in August 21, 2014, 2014, 11th in October 2014, 2014, and 81th in November 4, 2014.

B paid all the above 81th waste disposal amount (1,540,000 won including value added tax per unit) to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant was paid in full from B, but the defendant alleged that he did not receive waste treatment from the development of the Daeung Industries, which transported wastes from November 2014 to December 2014.