1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 2, 3, 6, and 11, unless there is a dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings:

원고는 2014. 2. 10. 피고에게 창원시 진해구 B에 있는 C마트지하1층 D 목욕탕의 일부를 보증금 5,000,000원에 임대하여 쑥뜸방으로 사용하도록 하면서 피고와 사이에 부득이한 사정이 있으면 계약기간 만료 전이라도 1개월 전에 상대방에게 통보하고 계약을 해지할 수 있는 것으로 약정하였다.

B. The Plaintiff decided to install new facilities after removing the existing facilities, and around June 18, 2014, notified individually the lessees of the above D building and announced the removal individually. On July 9, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with the construction period from July 28, 2014 to September 30, 2014.

다. 그러나 피고는 공사완료 후에도 영업의 계속을 보장해주거나 보상금 30,000,000원을 지급할 것을 요구하며 임차건물의 인도를 거부하였고, 이에 원고는 2014. 8. 중순경 피고의 쑥뜸방에 있던 집기류를 지하세탁실로 옮겨 보관한 다음 철거공사를 진행하도록 함으로써 2014. 10. 27.경 철거공사가 완료되었다. 라.

On January 25, 2016, the Plaintiff deposited the amount equivalent to the lease deposit to the Defendant.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment are asserted by the defendant, unlike the contract, that the construction was delayed for about one month due to the defendant's refusal to deliver the building for the removal construction. Accordingly, the plaintiff claimed compensation against the defendant for damages arising from the loss of rental income equivalent to KRW 57,750,00,00, which occurred due to the loan's interest rate of KRW 22,824,70,00, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge that the construction completion was delayed entirely due to the defendant's refusal to deliver the building leased for the purpose of the removal construction.