The prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. At around 10:00 on March 26, 2018, the Defendants conspired to the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and the victim E (the 51 year old) damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “The victim, among the employees G, H, and F, shows light that there is a strings between two persons, and it is obvious that there is such a strings. The strings, i.e., the strings., the strings., the strings., the strings.” The Defendant B said that “the two persons are not in the strings., the strings., the strings.”

B. Defendant B: (a) around 08:20 on March 28, 2018.

Among 8 and 9 employees such as F, etc. at the same place as in the same paragraph, the victim damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by saying, “I may have a frithm frithm frithm frithm frithm frithm frith.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 307(2) and 30 of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 307 of the Criminal Act (a point of defamation against Defendant B);

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act.

C. On January 22, 2019, the expression of intent that the victim E does not want punishment.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;