A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Although the Defendant is a person operating D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), D is merely a person operating D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), D was closed ex officio as of December 31, 2009 due to a default of approximately KRW 150 million including local taxes, and D’s wages were not paid properly to D’s employees. On December 7, 2009, the Defendant was urged to pay KRW 260 million from the business partners, etc. on the ground that C’s demand for return of technology usage deposits received from Tamste Construction Co., Ltd. using the above D’s technology was paid to D’s patentee and exclusive licensee, and it was merely called “E”, “F”, etc. (the Defendant’s aforementioned patent technology referred to as “G Public Law”, and thus, it was merely the Plaintiff’s request for cooperation in D’s design and construction work under the condition that D’s technical status would have been reflected in D’s design and construction work under the condition that D’s technical status would have been reduced.

Nevertheless, around December 9, 2009, the defendant reported and contacted Internet recruitment advertisements that D employ professional managers, and the public law owned by D was reflected in the design up to the present ‘current', and up to 30 billion won until the construction is in progress, and it was scheduled to start and execute the construction in the year 2010.