The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment of the defendant led to the confession of criminal facts and reflects the criminal facts, and that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine is favorable to the defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the owner of the mobile phone sales store by forging and exercising the application form for joining the mobile phone at will, by deceiving the owner of the mobile phone, or by deceiving the owner of the mobile phone by deceiving the owner of the mobile phone, and by deceiving the owner of the mobile phone, and by deceiving it. In light of the method of forgery, uttering, deception, etc. of the private document, the nature of the crime is not good; the victims are many victims and have failed to agree with the victims or to recover the damage despite their names; there is no special change in the trial; and there is no other various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive for the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.