1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the building indicated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

The fact that the Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction project partnership with the Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Group as a project implementation district, the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approving the management and disposal plan on June 3, 2016 with respect to the housing reconstruction project implemented by the Plaintiff on June 9, 2016, and announced it on June 9, 2016, and the fact that the Defendant leased and occupied the buildings listed in the attached list in the said project implementation district is not disputed between the parties or recognized by comprehensively taking account

In full view of the above facts, pursuant to Articles 48-2(1) and 49(6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building listed in the

Although the Defendant asserted that the above building was leased at KRW 40,000,000, the Defendant does not accept the said assertion on the ground that there is no evidence to acknowledge the amount of security deposit.