1. The defendant shall receive KRW 20,000,000 from the plaintiff, and at the same time, shall be the real estate stated in the attached Table to the plaintiff.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap 1 through 6, it is recognized that the plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project association whose project implementation district is Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approving the management and disposal plan on June 3, 2016 regarding the housing reconstruction project implemented by the plaintiff, and publicly notifying the plan on June 9, 2016, and that the defendant leased and occupied the buildings listed in the attached list in the said project implementation district from D to KRW 20,000,000.

Comprehensively taking account of the above facts of recognition, pursuant to Articles 48-2(1), 49(6), and 44(1) and (2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the Defendant is obligated to deliver to the Plaintiff the building listed in the attached list at the same time as the Plaintiff received deposit 20 million won from the Plaintiff.

Although the Defendant asserts that business loss compensation, director expenses, etc. should be paid, the above assertion is rejected as it is impossible to claim business loss compensation, etc. to the project implementer in the housing reconstruction project for which the expropriation or use under the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects is not premised