1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 21,376,150 against the Plaintiff and its related thereto, from February 14, 2014 to November 18, 2014.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the underlying facts is that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination

A. The above recognition facts are as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 4-2, Gap evidence Nos. 7-9, 18, 20, 23, 39, Eul evidence Nos. 4 and 7, and the overall purport of oral arguments is taken into account: ① as a result of the autopsy on the deceased, the deceased’s face and head were shocked into the internal structure of the vehicle, caused considerable bodily harm on the part of the deceased, and eventually caused death. However, C, upon being examined two times in the course of the investigation into the traffic accident of this case, stated that the deceased was dead’s sound immediately after the traffic accident of this case, and even if three times after the accident of this case, I think that the deceased’s sound was unfasible, but I think it was difficult for the deceased to see that he was damaged by the accident of this case and that he was damaged by the deceased at the time of the accident of this case.